Part 1: Performance Task 1 Self-Assessment
--> What choices did you make for your rough
draft performance?
I did not have a rough draft performance in class,
but I performed for a classmate of mine. When I did this, I decided to be
sneaky and steal something, then blame it on someone else when I was
accused.
-->How much time did you spend practicing for
your performance?
I think in total I spent about an hour and a
half practicing my performance
-->What specific feedback did you get from your
Rough Draft performance?
When I performed for Amara, she said that my hips
were too open, it was unclear what I was trying to do, and I needed to have
more facial expressions.
-->What did you choose to change for your Final
Performance?
I chose to make my performance shorter, so it only
featured my main point and that it was clearer. I also tried to look much
sneakier, and instead of steal something, I exchanged it.
-->How did you feel your Final performance
went?
I think it went very well, and that most people
understood what I was trying to show.
-->What specific feedback did you get?
I was told that I looked sneaky, communicated with
the audience, when I bowed it also showed the servant side and included
audience, and that I "blamed" the audience for the crown theft. I
also received feedback advising me to be a bit more suave and
have smoother movement, like a fox perhaps, to be stealthy.
-->How did you feel your performance compared to
stock character from video (for Classical Group only)?
I think I did well. I tried to lead with closed
hips, and I tried to do something which would benefit me. These were th key
things mentioned about Brighella and I think I showed them
well enough.
-->What score would you give your performance
out of 10 using Criteria B descriptors? Explain why.
I would give myself an 8 out of 10 because I
formed ideas and a theme and realized how they related to my
character. I also think I showed a good ability to develop the skills and apply
the techniques and process to present my performance with a good level of
proficiency.
Part 2: Performance Task 1 Peer Assessment
-->Pick someone who's character is completely
opposite than the one you chose.
Nafisa as first actress
-->Evaluate their character based on what you
know about the character.
I think she did really well. The first actress is
supposed to be very formal and sort of like a princess from what I understand.
I think she showed this very clearly. She had a little fan in her hand, and
walked arm in arm with someone who I would imagine to be as the first actor.
She seemed quite sweet and she curtsied which seemed very appropriate given her
character. Her interaction with first actor was good, however there weren't
many interactions with the audience.
-->How close did they come? What did you like
about their performance?
I think she came quite close to the first actress
character. I really liked the fan, it was a nice touch and just made her
character that much more obvious. Also, I liked how she was interacting with
someone else, as if they were on a date, I thought hat was very nice.
-->What do you think they could have improved
from their performance?
I think she could have included the audience a bit
more. There weren't any obvious take-outs so that is one thing to
improve upon. The other is that she could have held herself higher. As if
to show her importance. After all, she is the first actress.
-->What score out of 10 would you give them
using the Criteria B descriptors? Explain why.
I would also give her an 8 out of 10 because I
honestly think she formed ideas and a theme and realized how
they related to her character. She showed a good ability to develop
the skills and apply the techniques and process to present her performance with
a good level of proficiency. And I think she did very well.